this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
566 points (98.3% liked)

Technology

72321 readers
2853 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 72 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

We need a federated equivalent. Anything centralized can be stopped.

[–] Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me 25 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

At the very least I hope it's hosted by someone outside the US so it's out of reach to the authorities.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 33 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

For all we know the app might just be a honeypot itself

[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 18 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

This is a genuine concern that we should recognize.

I'm about 99% confident it isn't, but considering it is the kind of caution we should all be exercising these days.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
  • Is it open source? (No)
  • Is it's publishing and build pipeline open? (No)
  • Can anyone audit it? (No)
  • Does the author make unreliable claims of privacy? (Yes)
  • Does the author detail how data privacy and security is implemented? (No)

It's probably not a honeypot. But it's also likely to be negligent enough in implementation that it might as well be.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 6 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

How would we learn either way if it was or wasn't?

[–] jawa22@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 minutes ago

Someone knowledgeable enough would be able to figure out where every upload is going, I'd wager. But that would take Someone that is knowledgeable enough, as well as willing to expose an app like that given the potential consequences.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

When the feds come for you for using it

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Federated application for a map with markers and notes?

It seems for me that this would be too narrow a purpose.

Maybe a general-purpose public notification map. With some functionality allowing to separate markers by their authors and by tags. Or it can be spammed with bogus markers. By tags - well, for it to be general-purpose. By authors - because moderation can't be left to instance admins.

And, of course, I'm personally for separation of moderation, instance ownership, identities and hosting, but my own toy attempt showed me that the logic of checking the chain of privilege delegation is kinda PITA. That is, separating identities from instances is not that hard. And communities. What's hard is the community owner delegating rights to other identities, and in general authorized actions. It's a task of determining which privileges does an identity currently possess, and how does it affect its own actions on the community, and in which order should those be processed ... Everything is harder than it seems. Sad.

So federation is fine LOL.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Why too narrow of a use case?

Imagine federation with text linked to other text, that'd be crazy, right?

Wait, it's actually more complicated than that 🤔


But FR using existing federated protocols to build something like this is EXACTLY what the protocols are for. You don't need to implement the federation yourself, you can use an existing network