this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
800 points (95.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

8393 readers
2867 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Spend a little more and get yourself a speed queen top loader and never replace it again.

But also … my Maytag (same brand as my parents that came with the house that was built in 82) high efficiency front loader has been reliable af too.

Just don’t get a washer from a brand that is just a tech brand that now makes washers.

[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone always talks about speed queens and I always have to chime in. The cost isn't worth it. As shitty and consumerist as it sounds, it has been far cheaper to replace every few years than buy a speed queen. For one SQ washer I could buy 3 of my Samsung washers, and for one SQ dryer I could buy 4 of my Samsung ones. I got both my washer and dryer used. The washer was bad within the first year and replaced with a near new referb and it has been good for 5 years. The dryer is still working After the 6 years I have had it. They cost me a fraction of the SQ price even with the extra washer purchase and still work. Even if they both broke every other year and got replaced, my 10 year cost is still less than buying a SQ. The price just isn't worth it.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

I guess you assign no value to the waste of using 3 to 4 times the number of machines