this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
842 points (98.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

3072 readers
995 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Well, it's not the worst concentration camp, but I'd rather be in a POW one.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 20 points 2 days ago

Somehow the amenities look worse than concentration camps from the 40s.

[–] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Monkey Paw: Wish granted, you are now in an Isreal IDF run camp for suspicion of being a Hammas Insurgent .

Good luck

[–] msprout@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Israel: puts food out for the Palestinians to eat

Palestinians: goes and gets the food

Israel: "what the fuck?"

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

It's interesting how words change. These kinds of camps have always been bad, but the term "concentration camp" was initially chosen to make it seem benign. The idea was that it's not a prison camp, it's not a detainment camp, they're merely "concentrating" people there. Then, in WWII, the term became associated with Nazi death camps.

What's different this time around is that although the government doesn't want people to think "death camp", they're gleefully promoting the idea that they will be incredibly unpleasant. Torture maybe, but not death.

But, in truth, death is likely. Cramped living conditions in a swamp in the summer in Florida? People are going to die.

Actual PoW camps were much, much more pleasant. They had to abide by the Geneva Conventions.