this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
509 points (99.0% liked)

News

36534 readers
3155 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Excuse my ignorance, but what does this mean? He threatens to 'primary' members of Congress?

I've tried searching, and that wasn't much help, employees of said member are to quickly start looking for another job. Something happens at the end of term.. And a Time magazine article, which was beyond useless in explaining what it is.

I'm none the wiser.. 🤷

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Congress members in the US are elected in constituencies. For each constituency each party typically fields one candidate. Before the actual election, the parties hold primary elections to determine the candidate for the constituency for that particular party. Pretty much anyone can run in these primaries. Your chance of winning very much depends on the support, i.e. funding you have. If Elmo decides to fund candidates that would challenge the incumbents in the primaries, he could likely unseat quite a few of them on account of having a lot of money. And yes, this is all deeply undemocratic.

[–] limelight79@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And yes, this is all deeply undemocratic.

Agreed, and it's worth noting the Republican party has done the same thing to candidates who weren't far enough to the right.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 months ago

That's essentially what they did over the last couple decades. Remember the Tea Party?

If the party isn't where you want it, drag it there.

[–] Babalugats@feddit.uk 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Thank you. Every time I think the US election system couldn't be any more open to corruption, I'm proven wrong. Learning something new every day.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait until you hear about super-PACs.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wait until they hear about AIPAC.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

This is the reason he will be ignored. He has more money, but wouldn't be willing to spend it. Israel gets some it back with military deals, he wouldn't.

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The ability to corrupt is inversely proportional to how active our citizens are in the political process.

Only like 10% of eligible voters vote in primary elections. That likely makes it far easier for money to buy enough name recognition via advertising to make a financially backed candidate a shoe in. But if you look at something like the NYC mayoral primary, a grassroots movement with support still beats moneyed interests.

That said, our country does a lot to discourage participation in our political process.