this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
325 points (93.3% liked)

Futurology

2934 readers
20 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Assuming $8 for energy, let’s say $0.12/kWh you’re looking at 64kWH. That’s like 1kWh/mi, which is pretty fucking bad. There’s no way they’re scaling this up, because the battery has to weigh at least 1 Ton. So to double the distance you’d need to initially add double the battery, but that’s equivalent of adding 8 fat fucking Americanos to the payload, there by reducing the distance you can travel.

Meanwhile a Cessna Jet gets like 27/mi per gallon. So 2.5 gallons of fuel gets the same travel distance, and that only weighs like 20lbs.

Also, haven’t looked lately, but last I remembered, jet fuel was like $11/gal.

[–] bassad@jlai.lu 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

$0.12/kWh is pretty cheap tbh.

I was making the maths with $0,40/kWh which is expensive but can be seen is some countries, and that gives around 20kWh/100km.

It is impressive that a plane does not consume more power than a car (based on false maths ofc)

[–] chonkyninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah now add more batteries to double the flight range. 8lbs per gallon is 16lbs, versus like 2,400lbs of battery. The inefficiency goes through the roof.