this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
212 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

12448 readers
550 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tetrislife@leminal.space -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Some guy brings up Singapore, I talk about Singapore, and the guy says it is not on topic.

Apparently, road design has nothing to do with whether public transport is involved or not and in what form.

That's the Internet.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

I mention singapore because you said UP doesn't have enough space to do it, yet you said singapore is small enough to able to do it because of unrelated reason.

You still haven't tell me how having a good public transport will automagically make sure this sort of junction, which consist of more than 90° angle left turn, no line to indicate who got the priority and who need to yield, and no yellow line in the middle of junction to indicate no stopping, would never exists.

You're proven wrong yet still want to twist it as if others are so wrong and you're the only correct one. Now that's the internet.

[–] tetrislife@leminal.space 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Respond with an example.

Are there large regions with good population density and existing land use that have good roads designed around those existing holdings, unlike what is done in UP, India?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Do your own homework before replying. If this is the result of 5 days of silence, then i refuse to further engage.

[–] tetrislife@leminal.space 1 points 18 hours ago

The votes on the other 2 points will tell whether your mentioning Singapore was "engagement" to begin with.

[–] tetrislife@leminal.space 0 points 19 hours ago

Upvote if you agree.

And you think that elevated road not useful to the layman taking up space is OK? And the problem is the simple design of the road below, which people use uneventfully everyday with common sense at Indian speeds?

[–] tetrislife@leminal.space 0 points 19 hours ago

Upvote if you agree.

So, you think that, even when roads and transport policies are co-designed on a clean slate like in Singapore, transport policies wouldn't have influenced road design? When even something as simple as a bus lane has been known to work?