this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
703 points (90.6% liked)

memes

16179 readers
2946 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

ITT: people telling other people they're trolling rather than accepting that humans can perceive reality differently, and the own perception is never objective.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is interesting it’s only the black and blue people who don’t seem to get it and get emotional over it.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably bcos the white and gold people are strictly wrong and it's incredibly obvious to black and blue people but for some reason there's a stupid debate because some people are bad at looking at things?

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (47 children)

That take only works if you ignore how visual perception actually works. White and gold viewers aren’t wrong—they’re seeing the same pixel values as everyone else, but their brains interpret the lighting differently. The photo has no clear cues about illumination, so the brain fills in the blanks. Some people assume shadow or cool lighting and perceive the colors as lighter, others assume warm light and see them as darker. Both are valid perceptual outcomes given the ambiguity. But here’s the kicker: the actual pixel values in the image are pale blue and a brownish gold. So in terms of what’s literally in the image, white and gold viewers are actually closer to the raw data, regardless of what color the physical dress is in real life. The idea that black and blue people are just “right” misses that distinction completely. What’s especially funny is how often that group doubles down like they’ve uncovered some grand truth, when in reality, they’re just less able—or less willing—to grasp that perception isn’t about facts, it’s about interpretation. It’s like watching someone shout that a painting is wrong because it’s not a photograph.

load more comments (47 replies)
[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, except, there is an objective perceivable reality. And we all see it. If you saw the dress in the correct lighting, you wouldn't have trouble discerning the color unless you had a malformed perception in the first place.

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

No this is exactly incorrect. We do NOT perceive objective reality. All perception is subjective, and then goes through a further filter of interpretation. If someone says something is blue, there is no guarantee they perceive it the same as someone else. On top of societal pressure itself being able to change perception.

This is why in every scientific endeavor we try to take humans out of its as much as possible.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)