this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

2954 readers
55 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davepleasebehave@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Why not just use a water reservoir which will also fill with water when it rains.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

This has no moving parts compared to water storage which requires pumping, and you’re describing hydroelectric power that requires building of dams or levees. Reservoirs are inefficient, have issues with evaporation, and basically flood habitat.

[–] SirSamuel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dams have major ecological impacts. Water towers could work but as I understand it storing heat in sand or salt is more energy dense/efficient vs elevated water and gravity. All of what I just said is based solely on things I've read some time ago but cannot cite, and documentaries about dams

[–] Lugh@futurology.today 2 points 2 weeks ago

A Swiss company is trying this, though using concrete instead of water. Wear and tear and moving parts are disadvantages though.

https://www.swiss.tech/news/giant-gravity-batteries-storage-renewable-energies