this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
659 points (86.6% liked)
Microblog Memes
10898 readers
2218 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's not a blank check to not bother with ethics though.
You know Death of the Author is just a literary analysis tool, right?
They aren't being villainized for their interest in the franchise, they're being villainized for for contributing to the bigoted organizations fund.
I can bitch about more than one thing at a time, it's not either/or.
Jesus Christ you missed the entire point.
No, it isn't just a literary analysis tool, it is also a statement making social commentary about how someone can consume a piece of media without being supportive of the author and their actions as a private individual.
It absolutely is either/or, because if you understand the point of the latter one then it invalidates the reasoning behind the previous assumptions.
It isn't the consumer's fault that the product they enjoy is tangentially used to fund oppressive organizations. Literally every single thing you consume under capitalism contributes to the oppression of a marginalized person. That's kinda the fault of the system we are forced to live under. Blame the system, not the individual.
You can bitch about the individual all you want, and I'll continue to call everyone who does a shortsighted, myopic fool.
That's true, unless you are buying the products or watching the shows on a service, which would be supportive of the author.
Stopped reading because that is so blatantly wrong, trying thinking harder please.
That's also true, but it is the consumer's fault if they continue to support products that are used to fund oppressive organizations, particularly if it isn't a necessity, and particularly particularly if they are quite well informed about the issue.
Yes, but some things are essential to living, but even in those cases the consumer can STILL vote with their wallet. I repeat, "no ethical consumption under capitalism" is not an excuse to make the choice to support unethical organizations when there are more ethical alternatives.
If someone told me they specifically bought slave labor produced goods because they are always cheaper, they would still be wrong even though everything in our system exploits someone somewhere, because there is always a choice between lesser evils.
Sorry you're so triggered that people are rightfully judging you for choosing your little fandom over human rights, but it's a choice you are actively making. Stop being a pussy and hiding behind excuses, you support J.K. Rowling because you want to.
No, buying the product=! Supporting the author. Again, since you seem to be dull I'll repeat for you "learn to separate the art from the artist".
I'm also gonna stop reading cause it's clear you don't think at all. Your position is shortsighted and myopic. Learn to think critically and stop blaming individuals for systemic problems.
Simple minded idiots like you are why the world is going to shit.
that's actually exactly what it is, like that is literally the most straightforward and direct way to support an author
While I disagree with the rest of your take, I could at least respect your opinion right up until your edit with this at the end. I can't see your downvotes from my instance, but calling everyone that disagrees with your unpopular opinion "reactionary liberals" is a pretty weak effort on your part.
Cool. I don't respect the opinion of those who disagree with this take. Those who blame the individual for systemic issues that are beyond their control are by definition reactionary. They react to the individual action and assign them blame for something that is not their fault rather than take into account the system factors that surround these choices.
So I really don't give a shit if you don't respect my opinion. I don't respect yours.
I'm really sorry that you see everyone opposed to your views in this way, it must feel really miserable from where you're standing. Have a nice day ✌️
And I'm sorry you cannot understand how disrespectful and unworthy of respect it is to hold the position to blame people for things beyond their control and for simply trying to live their life and enjoy the things they like.
People who do that are shitty people.
You're welcome 😊
What is going on with your moral compass that you believe that sometimes, funding bigots doesn't make you a shitty person, yet also lets you believe that disagreeing with you on that issue topic is enough to qualify someone as a shitty person?
If you can make an exception for people funding Rowling, you can make space for them disagreeing with you, without pretending that they're the problem