Fuck Cars
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
view the rest of the comments
The point of a critical mass ride is to demonstrate that the cyclists are going to assert their right to the street whether car drivers like it or not, so drivers' choices are to either support cycling infrastructure or stay stuck behind them forever. Not having cyclists use the road isn't an option.
It doesn't matter whether the drivers like the cyclists; the drivers must be made to realize that it's in their own best interest to capitulate and demand bike infrastructure in order to get the cyclists out of their way.
Or go like Canada and just remove biking or making it illegal. You're viewpoint seems clouded.
That seems somewhat foolish - a driver delayed by such an event is liable to be angry and complain rather than feel that surrender is necessary.
If other posts in this thread are correct (let's walk out on that limb), and politicians try to meet the demand of drivers over cyclists, then this is more likely to lead to stricter laws against cyclists as a result of drivers issuing (very justified in this case) complaints.
An effective protest wins both sympathy and ire, and leads to more voices calling out for your cause - this one just inspires ire. It doesn't unequivocally paint the picture "vote for cycle infrastructure or else", it more emphatically implies "too many cyclists will add to my commute, just look how bad it is now, we need less of them, so I will now vote against anything for cyclists".
Just to point out, for the record, I'm in the third camp - pedestrians. I've seen drivers dangerously overtake, I've seen cyclists randomly pull out forcing emergency stops, and I've seen both put pedestrians at risk with self righteous indifference. My take home from the post is "more legislation is needed for cyclists using the road inappropriately", not "we need more cycle lanes" and definitely not "we need more shared space sidewalks".
Well, that was a mass of criticism for a critical mass; one wonders if the critical masses will mass against this criticism or perhaps such masses will critically reflect instead and engage in mass critical thinking!
Wow, you really like your wordplay, huh.
Whenever something makes the news or the rounds on social media, this is your opportunity to advocate to other people for the correct "thing," whatever that is. ... Which you are presently not doing.
"But is that why they're blocking the road?" Yes. Yes it is.
Oh, the driver's feelings were hurt by a slight delay?
Fine. Here's a better solution. Molotov cocktails. Any driver that pulls this shit gets their car torched.
It does not only inspire ire like you think. I've been at these rides, and I've seen people waving at us from their doors and windows, I've seen random people join in, and I've even seen some (cool) drivers stop and just vibe along with the parade.
Some drivers don't like it, but the beauty of critical mass is how 1. Cyclists feel safer when there's a critical mass of them, and 2. In this event, drivers see that they're in the minority, which is a perspective change for any onlooker and for some of the more agreeable drivers as well.
At most of these rides, some cyclists can be rude (and it's annoying af but understandable) but I think the majority are trying to just show what a good time we're all having and respect the laws of traffic and other road users, to the extent that while we have the right of way to continue through red lights once the lead group has entered the intersection, we try to keep people riding on the right side of the road.