this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
48 points (98.0% liked)

Positive News

147 readers
122 users here now

A community centered on positive news from all over the world.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wolf314159@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Except my point was actually that ANY automated system WILL occasionally produce an error, or focus on the wrong thing in this case. And that was a specific response to your specific comment, not a critique of any attempt at automating parts of a system that will be an extension of my body. In my experience, it's better for my parts to favor reliablity over perfection in design anyway.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 0 points 12 hours ago

That is... just not true.

I mean, any automated system can spit out an error, but it erroring out once in a million times can be trivial if it's refreshing the tracking multiple times per second. There are plenty of automated systems that work reliably. Or reliably enough that having a button you push to manually adjust the thing is itself way slower than waiting for the device to sort itself out.

Either way we don't know until they have a prototype people can test. It could go either way. But to be clear, it could go EITHER way. It could very well just be more reliable than a manual override. That's definitely a possibility.