this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
630 points (96.3% liked)

memes

15288 readers
4708 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 24 points 17 hours ago (28 children)

FTFY: Remember when the president didn't get into schoolgirls ~~spats~~?

I mean, Epstein...

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 17 hours ago (19 children)

No, im not old enough to remember the Carter administration.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Not yo say he was good. He did some horrid shit, but he's the one us president I'd be genuinely shocked to find was a pedophile.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It would be odd for most to be pedophiles because sexual attraction to children is incredibly uncommon.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

uncommon

I fucking wish. It's an epidemic. Especially in positions of authority and wealth. Not sure what that correlation implies, but it exists.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah you might want to look into academic sources on this because the media likes to imply this is widespread when it simply isn't.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I dont pay much attention to that, my personal experience suggests it very strongly.

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I've never witnessed a man beating on his on girlfriend/wife, so domestic violence isn't real

Im the one arguing they are pedophiles.

Because i have seen them be pedophiles at me, back when that was possible. Im fine (or, at least mostly avoided that hazard), but have literally seen it happen!

And i was a pretty slippery kid, so odds are they got more than a few others. Im pretty sure i met some of them; the victims, but im not going to discuss that.

What's more pertinent: not one of them was ever prosecuted. So you wouldn't see it.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ok then you are entirely incorrect in your perspective and you should actually look at facts as your personal experience isn’t a good source in this case.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ive met more than i would like to. Most of them when i was a child. I met other convicted pedos, knew em pretty well.

I dont know that i could identify them now as an old lady, but looking back, apmost every single one had pedo vibes; at least a few asked openly.

None of the names i recognize have ever been prosecuted. Because theyre rich.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Vibes are never a good source when it cones to sorting data but at least youcan narrow down why you are getting it wrong.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

There is no good data source. If you run by prosecutions, laws do not apply to the wealthy.

I've met a lot of rich assholes, and all if them acted like pedos. More than one tried to groom me.

More than not acted like pedophiles.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I know an old guy who groomed a 17 year old from a student group he volunteered with, and right as she's 18 and graduating she's moving in with him. We didn't have grooming laws six months ago but we do now. Still doesn't apply. He "did nothing wrong" . Not all child predators are convicted.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Moat aren't. It's basically approved in our society.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

There are good sources your vibes/feelings/emotions just are not good sources (this is true for everyone).

I don’t think you can just tell if someone is a pedophile.

You should seek help if you aren’t already if you were really groomed.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry, did you both try to discredit me as a broken victim and tell me im wrong in the same post?

Why do you care so much about the reputations of the ultra wealthy? They're not gonna fuck you, bro; you're too old for them.

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

You made a lot of claims that have nothing to back them other than vibes. Im not discrediting you because you never had credibility in this regard. You are wrong about your assertion that most rich people are pedos.

You have claimed to be a victim if abuse and you are asserting factually incorrect and irrational views regarding tens of millions of people. Do you think that is indicative of someone who has a healthy perspective?

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I have literal first hand experiences of the ultra wealthy hitting on me when i was a literal fucking child. Some of them were subtler, and im pretty confident, and its in the realm of vibes, but a couple definitely were not fucking subtle about it.

The wealthy are all pedophiles. What evidence do you have to the contrary?

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

You potentially have an experience with a singular person and you are using that to decide wealth was the motivating factor and are using it to call all wealthy people pedos.

I don’t need counter evidence when the initial claim is this clownish.

I've very much enjoyed the company of a person who turned out to be a pedophile before, and im much too old for them to be of particular danger to me anymore.

I wouldnt write them off as a friend for that, just like i wouldnt write them off for being a serial killer, or someone who wears socks with sandals.

The wealthy, however; i absolutely would.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)