this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
225 points (97.5% liked)

politics

23918 readers
3187 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk’s businesses.

“In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,” Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns.

A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk’s businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Can't retire if you never worked.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 21 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The dragon capsule worked though? You may be thinking of starliner, which is Boeing.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm thinking of Starship.

So Elon's cancelling the thing that works, but not the giant firecracker?

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The thing that works is currently being used by NASA to get astronauts to and from the ISS. The threat was aimed at messing up NASA's current plans after Donald threatened to toss the SpaceX contracts.

There no contract for starship yet. They may have gotten a grant for future development or something. But it's only a potential tool for the Artemis missions in the future

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like running a national space program that depends on a private company run by a petulant child is a bad idea.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 0 points 3 hours ago

NASA has always relied upon contractors to do all the actual construction.

And luckily that permanent child just owns it. They made him step much farther away from running it after his smoking weed live on a podcast.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

presumably well thought out business decisions arent made spontaneously out of rage from a twitter fight.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

While on ketamine.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's the "You can't fire me! I quit!" response to Trump threatening his NASA contracts.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Seems more like the cutting off his nose to spite his face.

[–] noride@lemm.ee 8 points 23 hours ago

To be fair, that will teach his dumb stupid face a lesson it deserves.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Seems more like the cutting off his nose to spite outer space.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed. And Shotwell will likely remind Elon they can’t do that and stay solvent. It wouldn’t be the first time she’s uncancelled something he’s decided to throw out.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 13 hours ago

I wouldn't be surprised if starlink was enough to keep them solvent

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)