412
Battery-free solar desalination system produces up to 5,000 liters of water per day
(alpha.leofinance.io)
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
412 points (98.4% liked)
Uplifting News
15350 readers
220 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Your calling it a scam right out the gate. But you're not saying it's a scam. And you're not reading the article.
10/10
And you didn't read what I wrote.
I said most of these revolutionary techs are scam, because I quite literally see new scams like this on a near weekly basis. I've literally seen dozens of these revolutionary drinkable water miracle machines over the past decade and so far 100% of it was a scam so pardon me for being at least skeptical.
Arguments like "but MIT is involved, MIT!!" hold no water either because MIT and Standford have been involved in similar scams before, lending their name and credence to it.
Also, again, you didn't read what I wrote. I did read the article and sorry, it's not convincing.
Maybe YOU didn't read what you wrote.
Before waxing philosophical you should learn effective communication skills. And I'm not the only one who thought your opening lines were nonsensical.