this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
30 points (100.0% liked)

Books

5654 readers
48 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

  1. Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
  2. No spam. All posts should be related to books.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have read Neuromancer three times now and I 100% know what you mean. You do understand it more with each additional pass that is for sure but personally I think it is a bit over rated.

Not bad by any stretch of the imagination, and worth a read but I don't think it is as good as people hype it up to be. I think part of that is the strange writing style.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I think a lot of the hype is because it’s the first of its genre. It does for cyberpunk what LOTR did for Fantasy I guess and in that regard I can understand the hype.

Also he’s very good at using simile and metaphors to give a feel to the world and to kind of separate the genre from science fiction. He does some nice things by describing organic stuff using artificial qualities. Like of course you have the iconic “The sky above the port was the color of TV tuned to a dead channel”. But then there’s this other part where Case takes this potent drug and the description is something like his bones became chrome under silicone or something along those lines that I thought was awesome. But the plot itself gets lost in all these very vivid descriptions and how he literally moves from one scene to the next without anything indications.