Technology

137 readers

15 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

No paywalled sites at all.
News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
No videos.
Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

NBC.
CNBC.
NY Magazine.
Substack.
Tom's Hardware.
ZDNet.
TechSpot.
Ars Technica.
The Verge.
Engadget.
TechCrunch.
Gizmodo.

Encouraged:

Archive links in the body of the post.
Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.

founded 3 weeks ago

MODERATORS

Pro@programming.dev

When AI-generated art enters the market, consumers win – and artists lose (news.stanford.edu)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Pro@programming.dev to c/Technology@programming.dev

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Study link

The results were striking: Once generative AI (GenAI) entered the market, the total number of images for sale skyrocketed, while the number of human-generated images fell dramatically. On the flip side, consumers showed a taste for the influx of AI-generated images, choosing GenAI images over human-generated ones.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tyler@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

I don’t know why this happens on Lemmy so much but it seems to happen with literally every comment I make. I am not the person you were talking to originally. I commented to add on to the other person’s point.

And no, no one is telling you to stop thinking about it. They said “if you like it, you like it”. That’s not thought terminating. You can have a discussion about why you like it. You are the one that said “do not ask why we like things”. You’re literally the one that brought up the topic of “thought terminating”.