this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
1089 points (99.2% liked)

memes

15033 readers
3421 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SoupBrick@pawb.social 214 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Everything except for harming capital, ok? Now go kill each other.

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 103 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Huge companies would import stuff by the planeloads to avoid tariffs/duties

[–] AnIntenseMoist@lemmy.world 79 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Employees would be too busy hunting down CEOs to import stuff for the company.

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 54 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I imagine there would be a group of people in each company with special contracts for hazard pay to work on purge day.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Just regular pay, but with the promise of a Friday pizza party.

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 35 points 4 days ago

CEOs would be in Europe.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago

The smarter ones would be vacationing in a different country, or on open seas on their yachts

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Apple was literally buying up entire passenger flights and filing them with iPhones instead of people to skirt in under the deadline. Capitalism is a hell of a drug.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Realistically, doesn't randomly killing people harm capital, in so much as it would mean they must have more staff to cover the work of an unknown number of murdered employees afterwards, lose money spent training anyone that gets killed, and have a slightly smaller workforce available that also is more proficient at violence?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 30 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In theory yes, less employees means the value of labor goes up because of demand. This is what happened after the Black Death in Europe.

In the wake of the drastic population decline brought on by the plague, wages shot up, and labourers could move to new localities in response to wage offers. Local and royal authorities in Western Europe instituted wage controls. The government controls sought to freeze wages at the old levels before the Black Death. Within England, for example, the Ordinance of Labourers, enacted in 1349, and the Statute of Labourers, enacted in 1351, restricted both wage increases and the relocation of workers.[30] If workers attempted to leave their current post, employers were given the right to have them imprisoned. The statute was poorly enforced in most areas, and farm wages in England on average doubled between 1350 and 1450,[31] but they were then static until the late 19th century.[32]

Cohn, comparing numerous countries, argues that the laws were not designed primarily to freeze wages. Instead, he says that the energetic local and royal measures to control labour and artisans' prices were responses to elite fears of the greed and the possible new powers of the lesser classes that had gained new freedom. Cohn continues that the laws reflected the anxiety that followed the Black Death's new horrors of mass mortality and destruction and from elite anxiety about manifestations, such as the flagellant movement and the persecution of Jews, Catalans (in Sicily) and beggars.

Of course nothing will stop the ruling class from fuckery.

[–] nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org 1 points 3 days ago

Defund and criminalize reproductive education and healthcare to get that birth rate up and destroy families (can't have desperate wrecked homes to make the army and overtime look good if too many people are allowed to choose skills and non-breeding family roles.) to get back to an extortibly unweildy population glut. easy peasy. Goes great with that scapegoating.

This has been A Modest Proposal.(/s.. aka that fuckery..)

[–] Kanda@reddthat.com 6 points 3 days ago

Let's go, Luigi!