this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
436 points (98.0% liked)

News

36043 readers
3042 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

BUCHAREST, Romania (AP) — Masked police officers in Romania carried out fresh raids early Wednesday at the home of divisive internet influencer Andrew Tate, who is awaiting trial on charges of human trafficking, rape and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women.

Romania’s anti-organized crime agency, DIICOT, said it was searching four homes in the counties of Bucharest and nearby Ilfov, investigating allegations of human trafficking, the trafficking of minors, sexual intercourse with a minor, influencing statements and money laundering. The agency added that hearings will later be held at its headquarters. 

Tate’s spokesperson, Mateea Petrescu, said in response to the raids that “although the charges in the search warrant are not yet fully clarified, they include suspicions of human trafficking and money laundering” and added that his legal team is present. Petrescu did not address the allegations involving minors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Sounds like he's still stuck in the 90s. The police used to be corrupt as all hell, but things have slowly improved. Most would probably take a kickback for something very minor, like drinking a beer in a park, but there's too many eyes on them for anything more major.

Just 2 months ago a guy I know came in from Italy, but didn't realize Romania has a zero tolerance policy on drunk driving. He had a single glass of wine and was driving. Police stopped him, asked if he'd been drinking, he said yes. Once he realized how much shit he was in, he tried to bribe them. They added that to the charges. He's now banned from driving in Romania (he had to get a pair of friends from Italy to come pick up his car), but they were nice enough to not cancel his driving license completely.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cries in north america where drivers can collect DUIs as if they are trying to get a high score.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I was 19 or 20, I got caught driving without insurance (don't do this) and my license was suspended for six months. Maybe two years later, my friend got pulled over on a DUI. He spent maybe an hour in jail before his parents bailed him out and got his license suspended for six weeks.

Like I said, don't drive without insurance, but I think I was a hell of a lot less likely to kill someone with my car than he was.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's obscene the revoke a license for insurance. I can understand a fine, maybe impounding the uninsured vehicle until you have proof of insurance.... But suspending the license? That's fucked.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I don't disagree with you. And six months was ridiculously excessive.

Of course, I had to go to work, and the bus didn't even remotely come close to my job, so I drove anyway. I didn't have a choice. I just hoped I didn't get pulled over again, which I thankfully did not.

[–] girthero@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

It's obscene the revoke a license for insurance

But think of the shareholders!

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Romania has a zero tolerance policy on drunk driving

Like blood alcohol limit is 0.00? Because most countries define a limit that makes you drunk and it ain't zero.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Yup, exactly. Strictly 0.0. There are cases where people have lost their licenses after having one of those little chocolates with the rum-flavored fillings. This was a reaction to a huge wave of deaths due to DUIs.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's a bit rough. Bread that rises due to the action of yeast contains as much as 1.9% alcohol by volume.

Additionally, the yeast used in bread and cakes contains a residual amount of alcohol. It is impossible to remove the alcohol in the baking process. Therefore eating cakes and bread can set off the breathalyzer by a small percentage.

I'm all for clamping down on drunk driving. But I'm not for making it illegal to drive after eating a sandwich.

 

Edit: the exhaled air alcohol content is higher, at 0.4mg / l. I assume that's been calibrated to avoid false positives from eating bread.

Traffic police has right to stop and vehicle and test the driver regarding drugs and alcohol consumption. The alcohol limit allowed is 0.00mg/l, if the driver has alcohol content under 0.4mg / l of pure alcohol in the exhaled air, he will be fined, if the alcohol level is higher than 0,40mg/l (0.80g / l of pure alcohol in blood) is punishable by imprisonment to 1 to 5 years.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

They're far from the only country to do this. Japan is the same way. Driving after even a drop of alcohol is illegal. It's technically even illegal to operate a bicycle with any alcohol in you.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Huh. So how do they pull over people that had those rum filled candies?

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

If they get into an accident, or it's a spot check, or something like that they get breathalized.