People Twitter

7223 readers

1038 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.
Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1299

Is that bad? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

279 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Any good start menu will have almost the whole start menu loaded into memory and clicking the start button should do nothing more than making it visible and enabling some event handlers.

I tried spam clicking my Javascript start menu on Gnome Linux (ArcMenu):

1 click per second: 0.2% increase
5 clicks per second: 1% increase
10 clicks per second: 2% increase

Looking at the reddit thread posted in this discussion somewhere it looks like a single click is 5% on Windows.

So no. This just shows awful programming by Microsoft and it's not up to the end users to just buy better hardware.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So no. This just shows awful programming by Microsoft and it's not up to the end users to just buy better hardware

Exactly. Javascript performs just as well as any other JIT scripting language. But taking bets, they are loading the entire engine on every click event instead just keeping the engine running in the background...

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'll take the bet and say "user clicks start so we must startup copilot" .