this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
943 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31385 readers
2270 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The march to Nazism takes another step

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It seems that Trump and Kennedy are going to lose their balls then. ✂️ A minute of silence. 😔

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

IQ tests don't measure intelligence. It measures how good you are at passing an IQ test.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Every tests measures first and foremost how well one takes that test. There are many IQ tests with varying usefulness.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nope. IQ measures how Western you are.

We cannot test intelligence. That's what the creator of the IQ test concluded after the eugenics championed their attempt to do so.

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry, but that is only true for a narrow, archaic band of the term IQ. Though I admit that within that narrow interpretation, you’re right. But there have been many tests devised since then to attempt to address those concerns.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] theherk@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe, in varying degrees, but also some success. Though intelligence itself is tough to pin down in the broader sense, there are some aspects of the measurement that are useful in both clinical settings and in research.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure. I'm not saying they aren't useful in a clinical setting. Just that they don't measure intelligence.

It can definitely be useful to measure how much knowledge someone has of Western culture

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, and I don’t mean to be too argumentative, but that is still a narrow perspective. They are also useful across cultures in the case of some tests. They are also useful beyond just knowledge. For example, for determining learning aptitude. There are many comments of intelligence. Some are more easy than others to measure objectively.

Again, you’re definitely right for a subset of IQ tests. I’m just saying in the broader sense they can be useful and even measure “intelligence” in some useful ways. At least, this is what I’ve understood from some reading, not as some expert on the topic.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you enjoy reading books about eugenics?

[–] theherk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No. But sometimes about psychology. Humankind is a good one.

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 year ago

It's all about making the cut. Whether you do it or you don't.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IQ tests don’t measure intelligence.

i feel like it's possible to do though.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not. All you can do is measure culturally relevant knowledge. That's what we learned

[–] obbeel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 1 year ago

That's true. How can we possibly measure logic if logic follows the characteristics of 1900's classical logic? Does that translate to real intelligence or the ability to get things done? I don't think so. What if the person just don't want to get a IQ test? All the more, what if their qualities are not measured by finding out how many balls are inside a cube? I think classical logic doesn't translate to intelligence.