this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
154 points (98.7% liked)

politics

23545 readers
2546 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

trump is a child at this game. Walmart has such tight control over its vendors it could require all of them to create new SKUs and slightly change the packaging (perhaps even the quatities/serving size or item packages) which would then be whole new products with the built in higher prices. Walmart could then claim they've raise prices on zero new products and its simply the items available are more expensive to buy from their vendors.

Further Walmart would close stores before it takes a consistent loss. Imagine the damage to trump's image with his MAGA cohort if the local Walmart shut down with a giant banner out front saying "Store closing due to tariffs".

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

A better message:

"closed due to trump taxes"

His name should be on it, and call it what it is, a tax. Conservatives like to foam at the mouth at the sound of taxes after all. It's one of the few things they've been trained to do.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

It should, but it won't. Even without checking, there's a 0% chance the Waltons and Wal-Mart's upper management aren't MAGAs. They're not gonna eat the tariffs, but they're not gonna throw Trump under the bus any more than they have to either.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 10 hours ago

They aren't MAGA. They're in only for themselves and will temporarily ally with anything they think make them more in the long run. Which currently is Trump with MAGA, and while they share the motivation with him, it's selfish. I mean if he wanted to, Trump could offset the higher cost. Why should Walmart and not the one causing it?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine the damage to trump’s image with his MAGA cohort if the local Walmart shut down with a giant banner out front saying “Store closing due to tariffs”.

"We stopped the Woke Giant™©® Walmart and saved local business! MAGA!"

Nothing ever causes damage when words are just tools that don't have to adhere to reality. :/

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago

Driving another 40 to 60 minutes to get to the next closest grocery store in rural America may actually change their minds. Remember, GOP voters are frequently very quick to change their tune when they are personally negatively affected by policy.