this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
224 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31192 readers
2252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fingers crossed for Mar-a-Lago. Preferably with the owner in it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Well yeah, no shit. We're going to have 4+ years of random disaster shit demonstrating why we had govt agencies devoted to dealing with preventing said shit or dealing with the fallout and it's going to be realllllll interesting watching the red states fail to deal on their own

[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Watch Trump give lucrative disaster response contracts to private companies owned by his biggest donors. Maybe Musk will dump a bunch of cybertrucks on the government somehow.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who needs food, water, shelter, or access to critically needed medication when we can use the fema budget to airdrop cybertrucks into disaster zones?

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but think of the photo op!

[–] Trimatrix@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is way too optimistic. We are going to have 4+ years of random disaster shit demonstrating to the MAGA crowd that the agencies devoted to dealing with the fallout are all corrupt and thus need more budget cuts.

I wish I was being sarcastic but 100% thats gonna be the spin.

I have no faith in people to realize anything. They'll just imagine it's always been this way and continue being morons.

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah, they are going to say, “this is perfect evidence why we need even less government”

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

These agencies are clearly failures and we should cut all funding to them so we can pay double for half as much support to some private agency senator ___________'s friend/relative/donor owns!

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And just remember. Once we lose a public service, no matter who is in office later, we never get it back. Disaster relief is a thing of the past.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One of the goals of this administration is to borrow and spend so much money that any future govt is so buried in debt it can't function so, yeah, you're spot on. We've entered terminal state capitalism now where citizenship means debt service and nothing more.