this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1099 points (96.8% liked)

Comic Strips

16508 readers
2492 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Try seemingly open-minded questions about what they think. Gently introducing questioning will avoiding confrontation can work to shake their beliefs. It can be satisfying to see them become more nuanced as they try to explain.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They just bring up information as fact that they've put no research into demonstrating.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago

"oh well that's just not what I believe" -anything against their alternative facts

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just gently question those: oh, why do you think this? What do you think of those people who have another opinion? Keep pulling on whatever they give.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No. That's a poor way to do it. They have very clear ideas on why things are like they are, and for the basis of their racism.. they're wrong ideas, but they're extremely clear. Arguing without the understanding that they have alternatives facts is wrong

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Why would you think it's without knowing they got intoxicated by fake news?
That's the point, you think they have wrong ideas, so you push them gently to increase the chance that they will question them by themselves.
If that's a poor way to do it, maybe you have a better way, what is it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Why would you think it's without knowing they got intoxicated by fake news?

I really can't make heads or tails of this sentence.

That's the point, you think they have wrong ideas, so you push them gently to increase the chance that they will question them by themselves.

I don't disagree with gentle pushing. I'm saying what your idea is not going to push them at all, nor will it be taken as gentle. Honestly, it makes me wonder if you've actually interacted with these sorts.

The best approach that I've found is to beat them to the punch of saying things. Basically, make points before they can say stipid shit, they're very easily manipulated if they haven't already taken a stance in the conversation

Also going into the points they aren't as sure on, proving them wrong, has given me a great basis of getting them to admit they're wrong. It's all in tone of voice. Not being a dick about it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

You said this:

Arguing without the understanding that they have alternatives facts is wrong

I'm asking you why would you think that is not already integrated in my way, since I think it is implied by what I explained.

Honestly, it makes me wonder if you’ve actually interacted with these sorts.

Not the MAGA people since I don't live in the USA, but French conservatives, mostly through the diversity of background that exists in sports activities.

The best approach that I’ve found is to beat them to the punch of saying things. Basically, make points before they can say stipid shit, they’re very easily manipulated if they haven’t already taken a stance in the conversation

I think this could work, but it limits the number of opportunities quite a lot. I see no reason to not try both.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Soap box <--- We have not been here for about a decade. Very, very, very few people who voted right wing are still capable of being swayed by almost anything you say, and the effort you put into it, likely isn't worth it. More Republicans approve of him now 87% to 92% than they did in his first term.

Ballot box

Jury box <--- We are here.

Ammo box