this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
974 points (96.2% liked)

memes

14674 readers
4462 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Honestly the entire idea that the only purpose of humanity is to make the next generation or support that process in some way just feels gross in a very eugenics adjacent way. If you start with that premise, it's just too easy to conclude that anyone who isn't working towards that end is disposable.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Evolution is just natural eugenics.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, but also it's more complicated than that. Most species die off before being grandparents, and certianly they don't participate in the rearing of grandchildren. We specifically live long enough and have emotional connection to keep being part of a family structure past that point. It helps retain and pass on knowledge that proved valuable for us. Likewise, younger siblings are more likely to be homosexual, and it's hypothesized this was to build redundancy into family structures. If both parents die off in a hunting accident, you have a gay aunt/uncle who can step in; much better than being an orphan.

Yes reproduction is the GOAL as far as evolution is concerened, but contributing does not require direct participation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Is it though? Because evolution is only really concerned with a thing living long enough to reproduce. It's not planned like eugenics would be.

That's why there's tons of examples of dumb as hell stuff in biology because as long as an organism is "good enough" to keep reproducing and spreading their genes that is fine and that species will continue to evolve.

Eugenics would be more like if evolution somehow could select only for specific traits and then made sure to only let things with those traits reproduce. Evolution is much messier than that.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

I’m in the “there is no purpose,” camp. It seems like a bit of a mental disorder to me to (without any evidence) assume that oneself or one’s species isn’t just hanging around by random happenstance. Wouldn’t that simply be narcissism? People have long asked the question, “why are we here?” Yet there’s never been and never will be a definitive answer.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

From a biological point of view everybody is disposable

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not just humanity. That is the purpose of all living things, insofar as we can be said to have a purpose at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

No, it's not purpose. It's just a process that perpetuates itself.

It's how you make the next generation, but if that generation doesn't have a purpose, then neither does yours, nor the act of reproduction.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

...well in the long view, that's how we got here and eventually that's all that matters: it's a bit nihilistic but that's the essence of nature in the cosmos...