this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
87 points (94.8% liked)

News

37811 readers
1752 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) has selected Rocket Lab’s medium-lift reusable Neutron for the Rocket Cargo mission...Earlier this year, the company announced that its Neutron rocket will land its payloads at sea. To facilitate this, the company is modifying an offshore barge, named “Return on Investment,” to serve as an ocean landing platform for returning missions...Rocket Lab, along with Stoke Space, will now be eligible to bid against established giants like Blue Origin, SpaceX, and United Launch Alliance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So they are going to, what, spend a billion dollars putting ammunition and camping supplies for a couple of platoons in space so they can be anywhere in the world within minutes, but completely cut off from any other support or logistics? Fucking brilliant. We need a dozen.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’d definitely like to see this discussion: what use case could potentially be served by this? It will be ridiculously expensive and limited no matter what, mistakable for ballistic missile, and extremely visible.

For example maybe you have some use case where a covert special ops force needs new secure radios and for some reason it’s worth getting there in one hour instead of one day. Now you have a fiery trail visible for 100s of miles that this is happening and exactly where. No more covert

Maybe 007 is chilling in an embassy on a hostile country and Q needs to send some special equipment so he can do his job. But now you’re sending what looks like a ballistic missile into a hostile country. And landing safely in an embassy is a tough proposition.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing about this is a good idea. I pointed out just one thing that makes it an utterly stupid idea, and you bring up another. Everything about this is the stupidest thing I've ever heard. This is on the level of nuking hurricanes and injecting bleach.