this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
72 points (97.4% liked)

Vegan

1669 readers
32 users here now

A place for solarpunks working toward a world without speciesism


Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Stern@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"Chicken" and "Pork"? Sure, understandable... I guess. If they were going after, "Milk" that would be a whole other thing.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

They did this in Germany! Oat milk can't legally be called "milk", so it's instead "oat drink".

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago (3 children)

That seems ridiculous to me considering coconut milk has been called as such since the 1700s and I haven't seen a coconuts nipples.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] november@lemmy.vg 30 points 9 months ago
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

It absolutely is, especially since there are products with "milk" in their name that aren't edible (e.g. "Scheuermilch", apparently scouring cream in English). It's nothing but populism and lobbying.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

And almond milk is almost 1000 years old, and Middle-English called it "almonde mylk"

https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/almond_milk

So yeah, Big Dairy propaganda