this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
-1 points (40.0% liked)
Conservatives
110 readers
21 users here now
Pro-conservative discussions
Rules
- Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
- We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
- Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
- Attack the topic, not the person
- Report violations of the rules
- Downvotes are disabled
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So then should be easy to make up for the lack of taxpayer funding then, right? If it costs so little, the people who care about it should be happy to pay for it. :)
Be sure to up your donation. Should be easy. The cost is "so little."
They could have avoided this if they would have stayed neutral in their reporting and staffing.
I'm not gonna engage with bad faith bait. That's idiotic and we both know it.
Well I guess they could have given up reporting on reality like most corporate media, but that was one of the primary advantages of not being a corporate owned propaganda machine.
NPR should not be funded by the tax payers. That said, very little of their funding comes from the government. This is mostly symbolic.
Which should be easy to make up for. Because if people like them so much, then donations would be easy to make up for it.
Liberals seem to want a lot of stuff that they aren't willing to pay for lately.
Liberals are not charitable. Conservatives are by nature. So even small cut will impact them heavily because it’s not like liberals will donate.
good point