this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
10 points (67.9% liked)
Conservatives
89 readers
93 users here now
Pro-conservative discussions
Rules
- Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
- We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
- Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
- Attack the topic, not the person
- Report violations of the rules
- Downvotes are disabled
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He still had legal status and a work permit and was deported with no charges or trial. You think the party of "law and order" would take exception to this.
Why would I be upset that he wasn’t charged for a criminal violation when it’s a civil dispute? He’s already seen a judge and was cleared for deportation which is a civil process.
You're gonna need to source that one.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a949_lkhn.pdf
Did you actually read that? It states explicitly that the deportation was illegal and the government's excuses are bullshit. It was a 9-0 decision. There's no room for interpretation on this one.
I did. Read the section about if he needs to come back. He doesn’t. They have no obligation to bring him back. They just can’t leave him in El Salvador.
First, they were ordered to process him as they would normally. Second, go back and read my first comment again. They did something illegal, they admitted to doing something illegal, the supreme court ordered them to follow the law, they said "whoops, nah."
And you see no problem with this because...?
You literally just proved this wrong yourself. He was deported before this process even began.
That is incorrect. He was already denied asylum and approved for deportation in 2019.