this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
458 points (99.4% liked)

politics

23115 readers
3144 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 week ago (4 children)

He's probably about as safe as anyone can be. A sitting US senator is among the most powerful people in the world.

Would Trump gladly imprison Van Hollen in a foreign concentration camp? Absolutely.

We're not there yet, and acts of resistance, no matter how small, are how we prevent us from getting there in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

trump led a violent insurrection to lynch his vice president and many other horrific things to congress. He experienced no consequences and has since pardoned his army.

So no, being a politician isn't protection and pretending it is is just self delusion.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is on some prior world view that a sitting Senator would receive the full faith and backing of the US Government. That should anything ill befall them, there would a special kind of hell so furious to pay that world would balk.

How do we think Trump would react if Van Hollen were taken into custody? Would he demand his return? Or would he reward Bukele?

We can't live under previous assumptions we know no longer hold.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with everything you said. None of us knows what might happen.

But for everyone out there screaming "Do something!" (Myself included), this is undoubtedly something.

The alternative is to do nothing in fear of what Trump might do.

That's what Trump wants. He has the power that he's given. To acquiesce is to grant him power.

That's what every law firm and university that's capitulated to Trump has done, so I'll support Van Hollen's open defiance any day of the week.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Well said. It's not like anyone around here is going to be sure to make it known when they are wrong. When he goes and he's anything less than captured and put in prison, you won't hear a single peep out of all these people who are so sure today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As soon as I read the headline, I was picturing that footage from Jonestown of the visiting Senators getting shot.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

We’re not there yet

Maybe that’s only because the opportunity hasn’t presented itself yet? Guess we’ll find out mid-week. But the fact that this is even a possibility should terrify everyone.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

A sitting US senator is among the most powerful people in the world.

Because the Senator is traditionally operating with the expectation of full federal support and protection.

We’re not there yet, and acts of resistance, no matter how small, are how we prevent us from getting there in the first place.

I mean, if Holden's going down there with a hundred marines and the intent of liberating Garcia by force, maybe. As it stands, the best case scenario is just a photo-op of him pounding on the bars. Hollen has no leverage, unless he's sitting on some corporate or neighboring civil interest that can titty-twist Bukele on his behalf.