this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !tankiejerk@piefed.social

1097 readers
1 users here now

COMM HAS MOVED TO !tankiejerk@piefed.social

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

To be fair. "that wasn't true Communism" is true. The problem is dictatorships keep getting sold with its name. Ironically proving how hard it would be to actually achieve a world or country of communes.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Except those people prefer the Chinese and USSR style of social autocracies to actual socialist projects. Some of them even trash worker coops, although that was more true to the InfraHaz style lolcows than the tankies of lemmy...

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Social Autocracy, oh wow that's a new one on me. They're just brutal dictatorships with a shiny veneer.

[–] Sorgan71@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The bolshivek revolution made it certain that any communist nation is a dictatorship. The menshiveks would have achieved better results.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's the problem though. When you study revolutions you overwhelmingly find there is a group doing reforms in a civilized way after the previous government is removed. And they almost always get lined up against a wall by a power hungry asshole.

[–] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The Mensheviks wouldn't have been much more different than German and French socialdemocrats who accepted capitalism. But there were other relevant left-leaning political forces during the Russian Revolution that were neither Bolsheviks nor Mensheviks - I wonder what happened with them?

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

I wonder what happened with them?

Gulag happened to them.

[–] sudo@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Wait until you learn whatt the SPD did to the Spartactus League.

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The only kind of Communism I'm willing to accept is the Star Trek Communism. Until then I'm pro Team "Social market economy"!

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Fully Automated Gay Space Communism or bust!

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

By that stupid definition there's no true capitalism either, so what's your point?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Oh? Are there no countries with private ownership of industry?

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Communism is inherently authoritarian as it puts the needs of a social construct (in this case a "commune" or "society") over the needs, rights and freedoms of an individual. It is hard to achieve anything good with communism, because totalitarian dictatorship is the only possible outcome for any advanced enough authoritarian ideology.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Communism is a classless, moneyless, stateless society.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whose going to take care of the utilities?

It ✨ d e p e n d s ✨ on what kind of communist answers.