this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2025
14 points (79.2% liked)

Fedigrow

1228 readers
75 users here now

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Resources:

Megathreads:

Rules:

  1. Be respectful
  2. No bigotry

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

I want to pitch someone to do some posts in [email protected]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks what are correct terms for other countries?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

BIPOC in the US i guess. I don't think this type of term is too popular outside those two countries (since most of the world is "bame/bipoc" anyway lol, so it makes sense.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I usually use POC, seems more encompassing that BIPOC, I guess BI is there to highlight the US specific history

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Personally i don't any of those terms at all. If i want to refer to non-westerners, i just say "africans/asians/latinos/etcetc" or "the global south" (which covers most). I never liked the terms BIPOC or BAME (speaking as one, just in case ofc) mostly because of how it kind of implies we're secondary. Beyond the contexts of US/europe the terms really don't make any sense, it's basically unheard of here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I never liked the terms BIPOC or BAME (speaking as one, just in case ofc) mostly because of how it kind of implies we’re secondary. Beyond the contexts of US/europe

I see where you come from, but they were indeed created to give visibility for those minorities in those context. Someone can be a US citizen and a POC, or a German and a POC at the same time, they are not exclusives. In those context the those names make sense.

Of course outside of those context the words don't really make sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Yeah that's fair, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

That's interesting because the c term is inappropriate in the UK

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

It is interesting that "person of colour" is appropriate while "coloured person" is not, as they are linguistically nearly identical. Obviously the two terms have very different historical contexts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Difference in offense can be interesting. I was surprised to hear that "kaffir" was a slur in south africa, since in arabia (and the middle east in general), it's an arabic word meaning "infidel". Apparently it's considered very, very offensive and racist (i don't know about the stance in america/europe on the word) and i think can get consequences? Idk, it's just a term here lmao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Interesting indeed!