this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)
World News
1009 readers
714 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
Other communities of interest:
founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's apparently a little more controversial than that. There's a whole community of "truthers" that are committed to debunking the idea that Van Riper's tactics would have worked in the real world and accuse him of gaming the simulation and ruining the productiveness of this massive exercise by, more or less, using exploits. On the other hand, there are some other military people who say more or less that his job wasn't to make an objectively productive exercise, it was to win, and at that he excelled and fair's fair. The truth is probably a mixture of both, innovative tactics alongside semi-exploits that aren't applicable to the real world.
His real job was to find exploits so that we could learn and mitigate them. If we learned and take steps to prevent what he did from working in the real world he did his job. If we didn't take steps (at least gain confidence that this isn't real world possible) then he failed.
Sounds like Enders Game.
Curious to know how the exploits would not be applicable in real world.
Some of them would, some would not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Challenge_2002