this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

Low Carb High Fat - Ketogenic

75 readers
2 users here now

A casual community to talk about LCHF/Ketogenic lifestyles, issues, benefits, difficulties, recipes, foods.

The more science focused sister community is [email protected]

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Stay on topic
  3. Don’t farm rage
  4. Be respectful of other diets, choices, lifestyles!!!
  5. No Blanket down voting - If you only come to this community to downvote its the wrong community for you

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

TLDR - If you are a ketogenic lean mass hyper responder with high LDL, insist on imaging to determine your atherosclerotic risk, as this study indicates the LDL and ApoB by itself doesn't indicate a growth in plaque.

Background - Changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) among people following a ketogenic diet (KD) are heterogeneous. Prior work has identified an inverse association between body mass index and change in LDL-C. However, the cardiovascular disease risk implications of these lipid changes remain unknown.

Objectives - The aim of the study was to examine the association between plaque progression and its predicting factors.

Methods - One hundred individuals exhibiting KD-induced LDL-C ≥190 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥60 mg/dL, and triglycerides ≤80 mg/dL were followed for 1 year using coronary artery calcium and coronary computed tomography angiography. Plaque progression predictors were assessed with linear regression and Bayes factors. Diet adherence and baseline cardiovascular disease risk sensitivity analyses were performed.

Results - High apolipoprotein B (ApoB) (median 178 mg/dL, Q1-Q3: 149-214 mg/dL) and LDL-C (median 237 mg/dL, Q1-Q3: 202-308 mg/dL) with low total plaque score (TPS) (median 0, Q1-Q3: 0-2.25) were observed at baseline. Neither change in ApoB (median 3 mg/dL, Q1-Q3: −17 to 35), baseline ApoB, nor total LDL-C exposure (median 1,302 days, Q1-Q3: 984-1,754 days) were associated with the change in noncalcified plaque volume (NCPV) or TPS. Bayesian inference calculations were between 6 and 10 times more supportive of the null hypothesis (no association between ApoB and plaque progression) than of the alternative hypothesis. All baseline plaque metrics (coronary artery calcium, NCPV, total plaque score, and percent atheroma volume) were strongly associated with the change in NCPV.

Conclusions - In lean metabolically healthy people on KD, neither total exposure nor changes in baseline levels of ApoB and LDL-C were associated with changes in plaque. Conversely, baseline plaque was associated with plaque progression, supporting the notion that, in this population, plaque begets plaque but ApoB does not. (Diet-induced Elevations in LDL-C and Progression of Atherosclerosis [Keto-CTA]

Full Paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101686

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Nick Norwitz (author) does a great video presentation of this: https://youtu.be/a_ROZPW9WrY

If you prefer a written summary: https://staycuriousmetabolism.substack.com/p/big-news-the-lean-mass-hyper-responder

100 people, prospective study, with plaque imaging, a very strong signal.

TLDR: the Lean Mass Hyper Responders (LMHR) following a ketogenic diet with high LDL do not show a growth in plaque over the period of 1 year. 6 people showed a reduction in plaque.

  • Most participants showed no or minimal progression of coronary plaque

  • Neither ApoB nor LDL exposure predicted plaque progression

While both LDL-C and ApoB are independent risk factors for atherosclerosis, the absolute risk associated with elevated LDL-C and ApoB is CONTEXT-DEPENDENT, including the etiology (cause) of the elevations in these biomarkers, LDL-C and ApoB as well as interactions with other risk markers, like insulin resistance

high LDL-C and ApoB among a metabolically healthy population have different cardiovascular risk implications than high LDL-C among those with metabolic dysfunction.

  • Elevations in LDL-C and ApoB are dynamic and result from a metabolic response to carbohydrate restriction, rather than as a function of a genetic defect. These people aren’t born with high LDL, it’s a response to carbohydrate restriction having to do with energy flux through the body.

  • These participants are of normal-health weight (BMI <25 kg/m2) and metabolically healthy rather than living with obesity, pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes or other insulin resistance disorders.

  • The high LDL-C and ApoB in this phenotype emerge as part of a lipid triad, also inclusive of high HDL-C and low triglycerides, representing a metabolic signature of a distinct physiological state.