this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
157 points (97.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2723 readers
1106 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

i seen young people go on disability after working very few years get more than that from SSA, i guess she was homemaker most of her life? still should get more than that under current standards, let alone the better standards we would like to see

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's kind of crazy to think how much value a homemaker creates, and then can be left with nothing to retire depending on personal circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

"Homemakers" have their payments tied to their spouse's income to avoid this exact scenario. Including if they got divorced.

The reality is that SS was not designed to be a sole retirement income.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

And the people they’ve kept a home for often then go on to be caretakers for them, thus completing the cycle of people we rely on the most while providing the least.