this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
974 points (99.4% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2347 readers
303 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 weeks ago (19 children)

Never really made sense to me, loose all the arrows at once and then give a break between volleys? Gives everyone a chance to hide behind their shield, and then advance when it's clear. Unless volleys are perfectly timed between multiple rows of archers.

Random arrows flying constantly never gives the enemy a chance to feel safe since it's a constant barrage, and there's no wasted time for the archers needing to wait for the command to fire.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Quite right and why make your fastest, best archers wait for your slowest ones?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe, but each archer will only be able to have so many arrows. What good is an archer if he only had 20 arrows and fired them all, already? If command thinks they'll need archer support for more strategic things, they may not want them firing off as many as they can quickly, even if the archer believes each arrow will hit its mark.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Armies relying on archers often had a continuous resupply running towards archers in position.

load more comments (16 replies)