California
Welcome to /c/California, an online haven that brings to life the unrivaled diversity and vibrancy of California! This engaging community offers a virtual exploration of the Golden State, taking you from the stunning Pacific coastline to the rugged Sierra Nevada, and every town, city, and landmark in between. Discover California's world-class wineries, stunning national parks, innovative tech scene, robust agricultural heartland, and culturally diverse metropolises.
Discussions span a wide range of topics—from travel tips and restaurant recommendations to local politics and environmental issues. Whether you're a lifelong resident, a recent transplant, or planning your dream visit, /c/California is your one-stop place to share experiences, ask questions, and celebrate all the things that make California truly unique.
Related Communities:
Nearby Communities:
- California
- Bakersfield, CA
- Bay Area, CA
- Burbank, CA
- Fresno, CA
- Long Beach, CA
- Los Angeles, CA
- Oakland, CA
- San Diego, CA
- San Jose, CA
- San Francisco, CA
- Sacramento, CA
- Santa Clarita, CA
view the rest of the comments
Three possibilities immediately come to mind:
a. The accused in the other well-known case was extremely bright, had access to the best education, while this person was not and did not.
b. It was a personal grudge but it sounded good plus a glory grab.
c. He's mentally unwell and/or overindulged, while also not being extremely bright.
Disclaimer; I'm a random on the internet and this is wild speculation, so none of those could apply.
Those who are mentally well, smart and diligent enough, to know how to effectively locate and kill a CEO are usually also mentally well and smart enough to know better.
Those with the motive rarely have the means, and those with the means rarely have the motive.
Not killing a CEO is better?
Know better than to commit murder. There are some pretty major consequences if you're convicted.
There are consequences to not killing a CEO now and then too.