this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
34 points (97.2% liked)

PC Gaming

10782 readers
701 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Would people be playing it if it sucked?

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nope, never said it sucked, never even said which way that mattered...

But if you read the article:

Concurrent player numbers on Steam have been okay but not great, peaking out at a little over 6,000 concurrents during Atomfall's first weekend of release. The 1.5 million player count is no doubt driven largely by Atomfall's presence on Game Pass, where everyone can give it a spin for no more cost than what they're paying for their subscription anyway.

6k on steam...

The single largest platform for PC games.

Meaning most are on Game pass.

We can't say everyone who tried it for free would have bought it. Which makes these numbers less valuable.

Does it make sense now?