this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
31 points (100.0% liked)
Linguistics
798 readers
41 users here now
Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!
Everyone is welcome here: from laypeople to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.
Rules:
- Instance rules apply.
- Be reasonable, constructive, and conductive to discussion.
- Stay on-topic, specially for more divisive subjects. And avoid unnecessary mentioning topics and individuals prone to derail the discussion.
- Post sources when reasonable to do so. And when sharing links to paywalled content, provide either a short summary of the content or a freely accessible archive link.
- Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
- Have fun!
Related communities:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Read the novel if you haven't. The screenwriter (William Goldman) wrote the novel as well, and it's fantastic. It has depth to it that wouldn't have worked in the movie.
I'm a huge fan of his.
Two of his works that got great movies; 'Magic' and 'Marathon Man.' imho both are as good as anything Hitchcock ever did.
He really understood what works on screen and on the page. It's a rare trait to have mastered both as well as he did.
Here's a great story. He was working with Michael Douglas on 'The Ghost And The Darkness,' They are both highly respected, very savvy film makers.
Douglas plays a mysterious stranger who appears halfway through the movie; white hunter type. The argument is do they give him a backstory? Douglas says peopel need to know who this man is, and goldman says that the story works better if he remains an enigma.
That's why I love movies; there's never a "right" answer.