this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
14 points (93.8% liked)
Fungi: mycelia, mushrooms & more
295 readers
1 users here now
This is a community for information and discussions on
- Mycorrhizal networks
- Mycoremediation for land restoration, water mycofiltration etc
- Biodegradable mycelium-based materials (building blocks, textiles, alternatives to plastic, to name a few)
- Fungal technology & biotechnology
- Medicinal uses
And so much more.
Some related local communities
Credits
- Icon: Studio Klarenbeek & Dros
- Banner: Pauline Moss
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
At the very end of this article which I'm not bothering to read because I've seen nothing but trash (if not outright AI slop) from earth.com in the past, they write:
bioRxiv is not a journal. It's a preprint server, and calling it a "journal" either means they have an inflexible template to slot this into reading "This study is published in the journal [blah]" or less generously that they genuinely don't know this, which is concerning as fuck.
Here's the actual preprint, but I want to emphasize that preprints like this haven't been peer reviewed. You should really wait until the paper is released in a peer reviewed journal to get the best, most accurate version of it (which earth.com couldn't be bothered to do, instead choosing the sweet, sweet ad revenue knowing 0.01% of their readership would actually read the original).
Great you pointed that bioRxiv does preprints, and not peer reviewed articles.
Personally, I found this theory interesting and thought of sharing it. Let's see where the scientific consensus will lean towards on this matter.