Maple Engineering
Welcome to Maple Engineering
Visit Maple Engineer on YouTube.
This is a community for those who come up with creative ways to make maple syrup. You don't have to be designing and building homemade vacuum or RO systems to participate. Have you done something cool with your buckets and spiles? Tell us! Are you proud of your tubes and buckets? Show us! Have you built your own homemade gravity of pumped vacuum system? Show it off! Do you design, build, or install giant, gleaming, stainless steel maple syrup production systems? Tell us all about it! If you don't make maple syrup but love it on your pancakes of johnnycake and want to ask question, ask away. The people posting here love to talk about making and eating maple syrup.
You may also be interested in:
RULES:
-
All Lemmy.ca rules apply here.
-
Everyone (see rule 98) is welcome.
-
If you've seen a question 100 times answer it the 101st time or ignore it. Even better, write a complete, detailed answer and suggest that the mod(s) pin it to the community.
[Did you actually think there were 98 rules?]
-
If you present something as fact and are asked to provide proof or a source provide proof or a source. Proof must be from a reliable source. If you fail to provide proof or a source your post or comment may be removed.
-
Don't be a dick. Yes, this is a catch-all rule.
-
The mod(s) have the final say.
view the rest of the comments
If I recall, doesn't a leak need to be pretty substantial to detect in the audible frequency range?
I've trialed and pushed usage of ultrasonic tools for this when I worked in maintenance engineering, some of my colleagues used then quite extensively and were able to justify the costs after the found a single tool air leak. Were also pretty interesting for bearing inspection, could pick up on damage far earlier than it'd be detectable with vibe or acoustic tools (certainly far earlier than thermal), they enabled some interesting lubrication practices too, aiming to prevent over-lubrication.
I found this USB ultrasound microphone that's supposed to be compatible with any recording application. My experience, just a UT microphone was more than enough to pick up leaks, it's very directional and presumably you're going to be fairly close to the source, it is expensive at €250, might be something to keep in mind.
I like the idea that was brought up to maybe try a frequency analyser first? Spectroid on android or Sound Spectrum Analysis were recommend by Voron Deaign for 3D printer tuning purposes (belt tension, though I use a printed tensiometer for that these days). Only thing I can think of is yeah, will a vacuum leak be detectable in the audible frequency ranges? Probably worth a try regardless.
Thanks! Found a couple of much cheaper ultrasonic detectors that claim to do this, so we'll try those (and the spectrum analyzer) first. The usb mic looks great if those don't pan out!
I'd be totally interested to see how those work, what sensors did you grab?
We bought this AllSun adapter . It was able to confirm some smaller dropline leaks, but it missed more than it found. It was completely useless at finding the larger leaks (mostly in saddles and 3/4" tees) that seem to be the bulk of our problem.
So I'm pushing him to try the hearing aid apps -- this one is expensive, but seems to have a good combination of EQ and pitch shifting that may make it possible for him.