this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
825 points (96.7% liked)

News

36233 readers
2680 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oh noez! Anyway…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Assuming for one moment that the ends really do justify the means, how is burning somebody's car going to stop the rise of fascism?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it's a war. all resistance is for the cause.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And how does trespassing on some random person's property and destroying their car constitute "resistance?"

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

it's a total rejection of musk. it will force tesla to oust him. the car owners are just pawns in a greater war against the fascists. sorry/not sorry.

[–] dryfter@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ok, say this all succeeds and Musk is thrown out of Tesla. What next? He'll still be the a billionaire with a US President as a puppet and complete "authority" to continue gutting the federal government.

I'm usually really good at being able to be objective and see both sides of an issue. I just can't do that with this. It's equivalent to a gang spraying and praying and killing innocent bystanders and saying "Oh well, it was for the cause". Like how is this any better than the right being ok with making millions of poor people homeless and hungry?

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

honestly? i don't think i even care at this point. we're a cancer. i'm in favor of just about anything that reduces the global population by half without destroying the environment or harming innocent animals.

rwandan style genocide seems like exactly what we deserve. i'd rather see the left pull it off than the right.

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)