this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
906 points (99.1% liked)

News

35724 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Edward Coristine, a 19-year-old DOGE staffer nicknamed "Big Balls," reportedly provided tech support to the cybercrime group EGodly through his company DiamondCDN.

EGodly, known for online of hacking government emails and cyberstalking FBI agent, publicly thanked DiamondCDN for DDoS protection in 2023.

Coristine, now a senior adviser at the State Department and CISA, did not respond to requests for comment.

Critics, including former CISA deputy director Nitin Natarajan, expressed concern over Coristine’s recent ties to cybercriminals while holding government network access.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How convenient and easy for you to criticize then.

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And what do you want non-americans to do.. exactly?

Thanks to you all I'm sitting here in my non-american country worrying about a potential world war. Though at least I'm trying towards increasing support for Americans refugees fleeing the fascist regime

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

And what do you want non-americans to do… exactly?

The same thing you're asking Americans to do. You can (still for now) come to the US and do whatever it is you think "they" should be doing.

Or is that too much of an ask for you but not for some guy who's been working in the forest service for 15 years?

It's so easy to be an armchair quarterback. These civil servants are normal people. They're not organized. They have families they need to feed. And all the Europeans are coming in here calling them cowards because they won't risk their lives in a futile effort to make a difference?

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website -2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Americans if you don’t live in the US: if you don’t like it, go back to your country! How dare you come here and criticize us while enjoying the lifestyle America affords you!

Americans if you don’t live in the US: If you don’t live here, shut up- you have no right to criticize because you have nothing at stake! How dare you sit there on your high horse and claim to know better?

I’m starting to think Americans just can’t handle criticism, regardless of where it’s coming from.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like you're not a fan of criticism either. Perhaps you should consider the plank in your own eye?

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I haven’t received any criticism- just told to shut up. Happy to take it if anyone wants to address my point.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I’m sorry, what personal risk have you taken to stop Trump? You’re demanding that ordinary people put their lives and careers on the line but have you done so yourself? Did I miss an article where you chained yourself to the Whitehouse fence or something?

You're criticizing ordinary people for not putting their lives on the line. Something you wouldn't do either. There's your critique - take it or leave it (my guess would be "leave it").

[–] whodrankarnoldpalmer@startrek.website 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Correct. I’m criticizing ordinary people who claim to be patriots and public servants for putting their own interests first while the foundations of their democracy are under attack. Every authoritarian takeover has been made possible by bystanders. Also, “Something you wouldn’t do either” is a very weird presumption to make given that you don’t know anything about me or what I’d do.

Now here’s where you double down, get dismissive, call me a keyboard warrior, whatever. Pick your tired line.

Edit: yeah, your whole thing is very strange. Going to end this here. Defending cowards while shouting NO U isn’t the rhetorical win you think it is

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Also, “Something you wouldn’t do either” is a very weird presumption to make given that you don’t know anything about me or what I’d do.

And what have you done?