149
As Trump dodges court orders, Samuel Alito suggests obeying judges can be optional
(www.motherjones.com)
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
149 points (98.7% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2743 readers
986 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Cool, I’ll optionally listen to the next judge I get in front of and I’ll let you know how many feet under the fucking jail I end up.
You'll be lucky if there's a real judge involved in the future if this is the way things are going to progress. You'll get an immediate hearing with a judge from an executive branch judiciary division.
Police officer: "you're under arrest for walking outside of your socioeconomic zone."
Defendant: "When's my trial?"
Judiciary officer: "Right now." [Gaval sounds] "Guilty."
You laugh, but this is coming soon if it's not here already.
We already have Administrative Law Judges (ALJ). You can get tied up in a "court" hearing with a person that has never practiced law as a "judge". This happens in administrative offices like Child Protective Services, the Social Security Administration, state unemployment agencies, and even the ATF. You can eventually appeal yourself out of these idiot-run hearings, but if you make a misstep like a missed hearing call or late form within the complex process you get denied justice.
Thanks for teaching me something new, albeit highly concerning. Can you imagine how bad it might get if an administration that promotes unitary executive theory took control? Oh, boy. We'd be in some hot water then.