Privacy

2074 readers

280 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

Be civil and no prejudice
Don't promote big-tech software
No reposting of news that was already posted
No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 5 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

If you use Mullvad, do you use the "Quantum-resistant" option in official client? (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've always had it on, but it's kind of a pain in the ass. Especially on worse (not necessarily slower) networks.

On laptop it's fine for the most part since the use-case is a bit different, but on a phone it's causing me some annoyances/issues.

With my carrier indoors it takes on average 62 seconds to connect. This is pretty annoying if toggling/switching VPN servers more often.
But when travelling (e.g.: in a train) it can make the difference from slightly spotty signal to almost never being connected successfully, impacting usability.

As such, I often find myself not even using VPN in such cases in the first place.
For comparison, plain Wireguard is done before I can pull away my finger from the "connect" button, usually even on 2G EDGE.

Do you keep this (perhaps a bit paranoid-level) option on?
Even if actually useful in the future, it would only protect traffic recorded from User to VPN anyway.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just use a search with easy language/localization setting then, you shouldn't use google anyway, not only for privacy but also as a matter of principle. Also, funneling all traffic through a VPN just shifts the tracking to them, so they still know which account number visits what and when. While in public WiFis, mobile networks etc. It's probably better to not use a VPN, as to spread traces over multiple seperate services. Or use multiple VPNs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'll trust Mullvad over literally any ISP and/or Government. If I wasn't willing to go even that far with trust, I'd buy half a dozen and chain them at semi-random halfhourly shifts of chains, filter over TOR between the last two and without a doubt whoever those 5 are, Mullvad would be my link to the shuffling chain from wherever I'm at.

Also, I don't need a reason to not trust anyone to not trust anyone.