this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
146 points (98.0% liked)

News

36782 readers
2304 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A federal judge warned the Trump administration for defying a court order by placing reinstated probationary (new) workers on paid administrative leave instead of returning them to their jobs.

Judge William Alsup ruled that the administration’s mass firings of nearly 25,000 workers were illegal and ordered their reinstatement.

The White House argued that full reinstatement would create “significant confusion.” The American Federation of Government Employees and other unions sued, claiming the firings bypassed congressional authority.

Alsup gave the administration until Tuesday to explain its actions.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A federal judge warned the Trump administration for defying a court order by placing reinstated probationary (new) workers on paid administrative leave instead of returning them to their jobs.

Setting aside the question of legality, I think that it's pretty difficult for Trump to make his case on political grounds. Trump's provided political justification is that he's trying to save money. I think that it's pretty difficult to argue that paying workers to do nothing is more cost-effective than paying them to do their job.

[–] courageousstep@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

We know at this point that the real motivation for these firings is not to save money. It’s to reduce friction as he becomes a dictator. The more gears the government has turning, the more spots there are that can jam up the system in protest. That’s my theory, anyway. I’m sure there are additional reasons.