this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
91 points (97.9% liked)

News

36634 readers
2338 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Earlier this year, Michael Woolfolk attended a legislative committee in Georgia where lawmakers considered for a third year whether to compensate the 45-year-old for the 19 years he spent behind bars for a 2002 killing before charges against him were dismissed.

Behind him sat Daryl Lee Clark, also 45, who spent 25 years in prison for a 1998 murder conviction that was vacated over a series of legal and police errors. It was his second attempt to obtain compensation.

Georgia is one of 11 states with no law on compensating people found to have been wrongfully convicted. Individuals seeking compensation take their cases to the legislature, where they seek a lawmaker to sponsor a resolution to pay them. Critics say it mires the process in politics.

Lawmakers have been considering legislation to move the decision to judges, but now it’s unclear if that will pass this year.

“We need to take care simply of people who have lost so many years of their lives and their ability to make money, have a job, have a family, create stability,” Republican Rep. Katie Dempsey, a sponsor of the Georgia bill, told The Associated Press. “Many are at the age where they would be looking at their savings, and instead, there’s none.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If an innocent person is held in jail and you dont want to compensate the fuck out of them, you are an absolute piece of shit.

[–] MiniMoose4Free@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

But...but... they might be a minority. Just because they have no active warrants doesn't make them innocent! ~ some racist dipshit.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

You want us to just give money to someone who was arrested and convicted?




Edit:
I guess the /s didn’t come across in my wording. It’s actually a relief to see all those downvotes.

I’m just so baffled that this could be “a hard sell” for anyone.

Payment should come right from the pensions of the department whose officer committed the arrest. No passing this off onto the taxpayers.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just give money. The money is just a start. All the people involved in the case should also be investigated to see who knew they might be innocent, and then those people should be criminally charged. Putting an innocent person in jail should have personal criminal liability attached.

And everyone who completes their sentence should be given enough money to restart their life along with social support to make it happen.

Knowingly putting someone in jail who is innocent should carry severe punishments. I think twice the time the innocent persons sentence is about right.

[–] BluescreenOfDeath@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Depriving someone of years of their life isn't a trivial thing. If someone was wrongfully convicted of a crime, the time they spend in jail is time that they could have been spending making a career, saving for retirement, building equity, etc. The things people do to prepare for retirement.

Should we just say "oops, our bad, no hard feelings right?" and just leave them to be homeless?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you lock them up for a crime they did not commit? Yeah. It's called "damages" and it's a well established legal concept.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

If they’re so innocent, why’d they get arrested and jailed?? Check mate.