this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
124 points (98.4% liked)
Games
18585 readers
347 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Would it make a difference though? I've only got a passing interest, but I thought top end speedruns were measured per frame rather than RTA?
something something bus something something 0.35 seconds
e: perhaps the answer is already there, RTA would likely be the only ones with significant differences.
I guess it depends if the frame count is an in-game frame, or a recording of the gameplay.
If it's in-game frames, then a slower newer snes has the advantage. You have more IRL time per "scored" unit of time.
If it's frames of the video, then the faster barrel-aged SNES have the advantage, at the cost of requiring faster button presses