this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

1648 readers
205 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

if a step backward in efficiency

Uhm, yeah, because it's a X3D.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

5800X3D is super efficient, more so than the 5800X in most cases.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wha, really? I thought it's with a bit more iGPU and some caches and higher clocked, for gaming?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It doesn't have an iGPU, and it's actually clocked lower and doesn't allow overclocking because it's harder to cool. In games it's still a lot faster because of the larger cache. The 9000 series of X3D processors don't have those limitations any more, which is why they are less efficient compared to the normal X variants.

That said, the newest chips can use a lot more power but also deliver more performance per watt if you limit them (eco mode), so efficiency is actually a fairly complicated topic nowadays.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Guess i mixed that up.