68
Trump Decried Millions Spent ‘Making Mice Transgender.’ It Was Cancer and Asthma Research
(www.rollingstone.com)
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
68 points (98.6% liked)
News
36829 readers
1951 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is not strictly true, even if it's repeated a lot. Because of our voting system, a large number of people likely didn't vote because they didn't need to vote. For instance, you pretty much know how things will end up in California or Idaho even before the votes are tallied. People who didn't vote in swing states on the other hand...
Sadly, many people think they only need to vote for Presidents, so you are probably right, although it's that they felt they didn't need to vote...even though down-ballot probably matters just as much.
Yeah, obv state and local elections are very important as well, although in some cases even those elections don't really require people to vote due to district composition. Generally, I agree with you though. I was mainly pointing out that the popular vote for the presidential election basically does not matter.
Strongly disagree. There's local shit to vote for, which usually has a much more direct impact on the average voters' day to day.
Nothing I said is untrue, strictly or otherwise.
https://www.cfr.org/article/2024-election-numbers
I did not get into the debate about the EC because the discussion is about the people that voted or did not vote for trump, not how he won.
My entire point was that the popular vote basically does not matter (and tbh shouldn't matter since FPTP is terrible, although the EC is also terrible), so you saying that Trump being elected because people didn't vote isn't necessarily the issue here. Even if literally everyone in the country voted, as long as the states ended up the same way, Trump would still have won.
You’re not listening. I can’t tell of you’re being obstinate or just trying to force a different perspective to make yourself right or something.
The entire point of the conversation is Americans, not electoral votes, therefore the popular vote, those who voted, and those who did not vote are the germane factors to the discussion. The EC is not relevant in this context.
Whose votes lead to the EC results? Americans. The arbitrary distinction you are trying to make here is ridiculous.
Obstinacy. Got it.
Your original comment said: "Also a lot decided to not vote at all. That’s really what sank us."
Clearly, the popular vote is not what sank us. The one trying to argue something different so you'd win the argument is you.