News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
no, it's very much on them if they choose to continue being stupid when being stupid cost them the life of their child. It's not on anyone else.
And if they choose to continue being stupid, to go back to the anti-vax community after the anti-vax community helped them kill their kid, well, we can only hope they don't have any more kids to kill.
You're thinking with your emotions, not your rationality right now. Fiki_fiki is right, by insulting people as you're trying to convince them of something only makes them cling harder to their existing beliefs.
I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything, as I highly doubt the aforementioned dipshit parents are reading this Lemmy thread.
I'm saying if the death of their own child doesn't make them wise up, nothing will, and it's not anyone else's responsibility to try and cater to their stupidity by softening the blow. If enduring your own child's funeral, that you caused, only makes you double down on killing kids, then you hopefully do not have access to any more children to kill. That's all. Please feel free to explain how that's "emotional" or "isn't rational". I think it's quite rational.
I'm not so sure about that. You're applying logic to people that never were acting on logic in the first place. Acknowledging the fault would psychologically break most at that point, I'd expect their brain to double down instead out of defense... Not a lot of people have control over that, even for smart people.
The distrust in science is because they do not trust the institutions which have likely caused real harm to them. It's a bigger problem. Life is not so simple. I wish it was, but it isn't.
I'm not saying they shouldn't be held accountable... I'd expect a trial to convince them more than the initial event which is emotionally extreme, they'd likely be in shock for some time. A trial would force them to think about it for a long, long time.
Hope they live a long time
Yes.